Maybe, he's worried about the competition of talent with budding film artists and 1s who really see his true, intended vision, those people who made it to the top.
His film sends a lie that we're all in the movie and we're all accepted as people watching it.
I think it has something to do with being a Late Baby Boomer. I can't tell my mom's age, but my dad is born in July 1950. I know about the real world. 1 thing I know on my own is that you can't just go out there programmed to do all these things thinking there's a point where push comes to shove and it's time to give a little. You don't calculate yourself like a ball, you feel for all possible options and not believe lies that you have to be under all this stress and sacrifice and whining.
Mars Attacks mirrors how his films are more stark or shall I say to the point that I just thought of the word stale, the people not alive in it hardly. I know if I were in a Burton movie things would go much better.
Batman was okay, but I don't actually like the story myself like it's "The Lion King" or something. Ed Wood was cute but still not satisfying. (A referenced joke.) Yea, Burton gets away with doing things like he doesn't have to tell anyone why he's hurting them. Like, he made an inappropriate, unreferenced joke.
Yes, but Burton carries with him a certain demeanor with The Nightmare Before Christmas, though, as far s being authentic in his own style that others copy. His weirdness is stuff like Pee Wee Herman and Beetlejuice. His lack of impetus is seen in boring movies like Batman, where they're just thinking of Batman and not the acting, like they think it's so prestigious and that's all they think about when filming. It seems like an American thing, and I'm only 1/2 American.
I guess you think he knows film but still lacks the know how and respect of most directors. It's just a question of substance and of course the nature of what the talent is. I still don't understand how you'd say it's the director that made the film bad, as opposed to an unfortunate casting situation. I think they just followed through being as lazy as they can, like Burton isn't a scary director. Look at Chloe Moretz in Dark Shadows, which was good, she doesn't have to do anything but look cute and Burton thinks that's okay, that it's enough, and that other people no matter what they do it's not good. Eva Green was good in the action movie recently and has hit a lotta top lists, including mine right under Chloe Sevigny.
http://youtu.be/plFCSURAVPk It's like Drew Barrymore. I do approve of her, but I knew that Chloe Moretz and Bella Thorne would come out different after working with her. I've seen people do these things in real life, but they don't know what they're doing. People just copy each other when judging situations like this.
So, true Burton is amazing, but so is Johnny Depp. I must say his past films do justice in a different way than you'd expect. I think Johnny Depp is the tugger of the win. To explain others's films, I'd say that they don't really hit home as much as Johnny Depp. He might be in their movies, see, or there might be a lotta corny actors to theme a hilarious, camp movie. Maybe, they are happy the director is like a dad, then.
paddling penguins are in our way
